Choosing the proper telephoto zoom lens generally is a problem, particularly when balancing value, efficiency, and value. Should you’re contemplating a Canon lens within the 100-500mm vary, you might have a number of choices, every with its personal strengths and trade-offs. Realizing which one most closely fits your wants is essential.
Coming to you from Jan Wegener, this detailed video compares three well-liked Canon telephoto lenses: the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM, the RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM, and the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM. Wegener explains why the unique EF 100-400mm model I lens is not a powerful alternative right now, citing its outdated push-pull zoom design and dust-prone development. He then focuses on the newer fashions, breaking down their strengths. The EF 100-400mm II stays a wonderful alternative for DSLR customers, providing sturdy picture stabilization and strong sharpness, however requires an adapter for mirrorless our bodies. The RF 100-500mm, alternatively, gives an additional 100mm of attain with a lighter construct, making it preferrred for wildlife and journey pictures.
A key takeaway is how the RF 100-500mm balances focal vary and value. It’s barely bigger however lighter than its EF counterpart, giving it an edge for handheld taking pictures. Its f/7.1 most aperture at 500mm could seem limiting, however advances in excessive ISO efficiency assist compensate for the smaller aperture. The lens additionally handles properly with teleconverters, although a design quirk prevents zooming wider than 300mm when utilizing them. In the meantime, the RF 100-400mm gives stunning sharpness in a compact, budget-friendly bundle however struggles in low-light situations attributable to its f/8 aperture at 400mm.
Wegener additionally emphasizes autofocus variations. The RF 100-500mm encompasses a Nano USM motor, providing a steadiness between pace and smoothness for each photograph and video. The EF 100-400mm II makes use of a ring-type USM, excelling in pace however much less fluid for video monitoring. The RF 100-400mm, with its STM motor, is the slowest however gives easy efficiency for video. One other essential issue is climate sealing—each L-series lenses (EF 100-400mm II and RF 100-500mm) supply superior safety towards the weather, whereas the RF 100-400mm lacks full sealing and premium lens coatings. Try the video above for the total rundown from Wegener.
