My drawback with “was” – Thanet Inventive


The phrase “was” is a straightforward match when writing up to now tense. Together with “had” it’s simple to make use of the phrase so arduous and sometimes that it turns into a distraction.

Whereas “was” is an efficient phrase and generally the proper phrase, there are lots of instances (corresponding to within the instance above) when a rewrite will produce a greater passage. These edits – to take away “was” – will be arduous. You’ve gotten used the right phrase. Why does it want to alter?

As soon as a reader notices how usually the author makes use of “was” each additional instance goes to be a distraction.

Moreover, the trouble to seek out one other approach to say the identical factor may give your writing extra selection, a stronger voice, and extra circulate. That stated, I discover these edits arduous.

I’ve added “was” discount to my modifying course of. This step will be a variety of time-consuming work. The top product is nearly all the time higher and extra satisfying to learn. At the very least I believe so.

The best way I strategy this edit is to make use of “Discover” (Ctrl+F) kind “was” (or no matter phrase I’m lowering) after which hit “Discover All”. That highlights all examples of the phrase. I then scroll by means of in search of clusters as within the instance above. The extra I can see on the web page, the extra urgently I have to re-word.

Do you could have any over used phrases that you simply try to cull within the modifying course of? Inform me about yours within the feedback.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top